Methods and apparatus for reducing sulfur impurities and improving current efficiencies of inert anode aluminum production cells

ABSTRACT

Methods and apparatus are disclosed for reducing sulfur impurities in aluminum electrolytic production cells in order to significantly increase current efficiency of the cells. An impurity reduction zone may be created in the bath of an inert anode cell by submerging a purifying electrode in the bath. In another embodiment, an oxygen barrier tube may be disposed in a portion of the bath. In a further embodiment, reductants such as aluminum, CO and/or CO 2  are added to the bath. In another embodiment, electrode current is interrupted or electrodes are removed from selected regions of the cell in order to allow gaseous impurities to escape from the bath. Sulfur impurity levels may also be reduced in inert anode cells by scrubbing bath emissions from the cell before they are reintroduced into the cell, and by controlling sulfur impurity contents of materials added to the cell.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

[0001] The present invention relates to the operation of electrolyticaluminum production cells. More particularly, the invention relates tothe reduction of sulfur impurities in inert anode aluminum productioncells in order to increase current efficiencies of the cells.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

[0002] Aluminum is conventionally produced in electrolytic reductioncells or smelting pots which include an electrolytic bath comprisingmolten aluminum fluoride, sodium fluoride and alumina, a cathode, andconsumable carbon anodes. The energy and cost efficiency of aluminumsmelting can be significantly reduced with the use of inert,non-consumable and dimensionally stable anodes. Replacement oftraditional consumable carbon anodes with inert anodes allows a highlyproductive cell design to be utilized, and may provide environmentalbenefits because inert anodes produce essentially no CO₂ or CF₄. Someexamples of inert anode compositions are provided in U.S. Pat. Nos.5,794,112, 5,865,980, 6,126,799, 6,217,739, 6,332,969, 6,372,119,6,416,649, 6,423,195 and 6,423,204, which are incorporated herein byreference.

[0003] During aluminum smelting operations, deleterious impurities suchas sulfur, iron, nickel, vanadium, titanium and phosphorous may build upin the electrolytic bath. For example, in inert anode cells, sulfurspecies can build to higher concentrations in the bath because it is nolonger removed as COS or other sulfur-containing species as inconsumable carbon anode cells. The presence of sulfur or othermulti-valence elemental impurities in the bath causes unwanted redoxreactions which consume electrical current without producing aluminum.Such impurities can significantly reduce the current efficiency of thecells. Sulfur species have a high solubility in the bath and act asoxidizing agents to react Al to form Al₂O₃. This can cause unwanted backreaction of the aluminum which also reduces the current efficiency ofthe cell. Furthermore, sulfur, iron, nickel and other impurities in thebath can lower the interfacial energy between the bath and the moltenpad of aluminum formed in the cell, thereby reducing coalescence orpromoting emulsification of the surface of the aluminum pad.

[0004] The present invention has been developed in view of theforegoing, and to address other deficiencies of the prior art.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

[0005] The present invention recognizes the build up of sulfurimpurities in inert anode aluminum production cells, and reduces suchimpurities in order to increase current efficiencies of such cells.Sulfur impurities may be reduced and removed in regions of the bath inorder to achieve high current efficiencies. Gaseous emissions may bescrubbed prior to dry scrubbing with alumina in order to minimize therecirculation of impurities into the bath while maintaining acceptablylow sulfur concentrations. Sulfur content of materials introduced intothe bath may be controlled.

[0006] An embodiment of the present invention provides impurityreduction zones in the bath of inert anode aluminum production cellswhich reduce or eliminate unwanted impurities. In one embodiment, theimpurity reduction zone is provided by a purifying electrode having anelectrochemical potential that is controlled within a selected potentialrange which reduces or oxidizes sulfur impurities, thereby facilitatingremoval of the impurities from the bath. For example, reduced sulfurspecies have much lower bath solubility than oxidized sulfate impurityspecies, and the reduced sulfur species can escape relatively easilyfrom the bath while avoiding a redox cycle caused by the oxidizedsulfate species. In another embodiment, the impurity reduction zonecomprises a volume of the bath in which oxygen is reduced or eliminated,e.g., oxygen generated during operation of an inert anode cell isprevented from entering a region of the bath. In a further embodiment,the impurity reduction zone is created through all or portion of thebath by adding a reductant such as Al, carbonates (e.g., Na, Ca, Li, Aland Mg carbonates), CO and/or CO₂. In another embodiment, electriccurrent flow is interrupted through some or all of the electrodes of acell, or electrodes are not positioned in certain areas of the cell, inorder to allow sulfur-containing gas to escape from the bath. Theseembodiments in which impurity reduction zones are provided in the bathmay be used alone or in various combinations.

[0007] Another embodiment of the present invention removes sulfurimpurities from gaseous cell emissions by techniques such as scrubbingwith activated carbon to remove SO₂ before it is absorbed by the aluminathat is returned to the inert anode cell.

[0008] A further embodiment of the present invention reduces sulfurimpurities to acceptable levels by controlling the sulfur content ofmaterials added to the bath, such as the sulfur content of alumina andaluminum fluoride fed to the bath. Mass balance calculations may be usedin order to select acceptable sulfur content of alumina and othermaterials added to the bath.

[0009] An aspect of the present invention is to provide a method ofoperating an inert anode electrolytic aluminum production cell. Themethod comprises providing a cell comprising an electrolytic bath, acathode and at least one inert anode positioned at or above a level ofthe cathode, passing current between the inert anode and the cathodethrough the electrolytic bath, and maintaining a sulfur impurityconcentration in the electrolytic bath of less than about 500 ppm. In apreferred embodiment, the sulfur impurity concentration is maintainedbelow about 100 ppm.

[0010] Another aspect of the present invention is to provide a method ofreducing sulfur impurities in an electrolytic aluminum production cell.The method comprises providing an impurity reduction zone within anelectrolytic bath of the cell. In a preferred embodiment, the cellcomprises inert anodes.

[0011] A further aspect of the present invention is to provide a methodof producing aluminum. The method includes the steps of providing a cellcomprising an electrolytic bath, a cathode and at least one inert anodelocated at or above a level of the cathode, passing current between theat least one inert anode and the cathode through the electrolytic bath,maintaining a sulfur impurity concentration in the electrolytic bath ofless than about 500 ppm, and recovering aluminum from the cell.

[0012] Another aspect of the present invention is to provide an inertanode electrolytic aluminum production cell comprising means forreducing sulfur impurities contained in an electrolytic bath of the cellduring operation of the cell.

[0013] A further aspect of the present invention is to provide an inertanode electrolytic aluminum production cell comprising a cathode, atleast one inert anode located at or above a level of the cathode, anelectrolytic bath communicating with the cathode and the at least oneanode, and a sulfur impurity reduction zone within the electrolyticbath.

[0014] Another aspect of the present invention is to provide an inertanode electrolytic aluminum production cell comprising a cathode, atleast one inert anode, an electrolytic bath communicating with thecathode and the at least one anode, and a purifying electrode at leastpartially submerged in the electrolytic bath for providing a sulfurimpurity reduction zone within the electrolytic bath.

[0015] A further aspect of the present invention is to provide an inertanode electrolytic aluminum production cell comprising a cathode, atleast one inert anode, an electrolytic bath communicating with thecathode and anode, and a purifying electrode at least partiallysubmerged in the electrolytic bath for providing an impurity reductionzone within the electrolytic bath.

[0016] These and other aspects of the present invention will be moreapparent from the following description.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0017]FIG. 1 is a graph illustrating the build up of sulfur impuritylevels during operation of an inert anode aluminum production cell.

[0018]FIG. 2 is a partially schematic side sectional view of an aluminumsmelting cell including an anodic purifying electrode which utilizes thepower supply of the cell in accordance with an embodiment of the presentinvention.

[0019]FIG. 3 is a partially schematic side sectional view of an aluminumsmelting cell including an anodic purifying electrode which utilizes aseparate power supply in accordance with an embodiment of the presentinvention.

[0020]FIG. 4 is a partially schematic side sectional view of an aluminumsmelting cell including a cathodic purifying electrode with an interiorcathode connection in accordance with an embodiment of the presentinvention.

[0021]FIG. 5 is a partially schematic side sectional view of an aluminumsmelting cell including a cathodic purifying electrode with an exteriorcathode connection in accordance with an embodiment of the presentinvention.

[0022]FIG. 6 is a partially schematic side sectional view of an aluminumsmelting cell including an oxygen barrier tube submerged in theelectrolytic bath in accordance with a further embodiment of the presentinvention.

[0023]FIG. 7 is a graph of sulfur impurity concentration versusoperation time of an inert anode aluminum production cell incorporatinga purifying electrode in accordance with an embodiment of the presentinvention.

[0024]FIG. 8 is a graph of current efficiency versus sulfur impurityconcentration within an electrolytic bath, showing substantially reducedcurrent efficiencies at higher sulfur impurity levels.

[0025]FIG. 9 is a graph of current efficiency versus sulfur impurityconcentration within an electrolytic bath and total impurity levels inthe produced aluminum, demonstrating substantially reduced currentefficiencies at higher sulfur impurity levels and higher aluminumimpurity levels.

[0026]FIGS. 10a-10 d are photographs of solidified baths. FIG. 10a showsa solidified bath with minimal sulfur impurities in which a coalescedaluminum pad has been formed. FIGS. 10b-10 d show solidified bathscontaining high levels of sulfur impurities, illustrating the formationof several uncoalesced aluminum spheres throughout the frozen bath.

[0027]FIG. 11 is a partially schematic diagram of a bath emissionscrubber system in accordance with an embodiment of the presentinvention.

[0028] FIGS. 12-17 are graphs of sulfur impurity concentrations inelectrolytic baths versus cell operation times, illustrating massbalance calculations for cells operated with varying sulfur impuritylevels in the alumina feed, cells operated with and without a purifyingelectrode, and cells operated with and without activated carbon SO₂scrubbers.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

[0029] The present invention reduces sulfur impurities during aluminumsmelting processes which have been found to adversely affect currentefficiency of the electrolytic cells. Additional types of impurities tobe reduced or eliminated include iron, copper, nickel, silicon, zinc,cobalt, vanadium, titanium and phosphorous impurities. The “currentefficiency” of a cell can be determined by the amount of aluminumproduced by a cell during a given time compared with the theoreticalamount of aluminum that could be produced by the cell based uponFaraday's Law.

[0030] Sulfur is a particularly harmful impurity which has been found tosignificantly adversely effect current efficiency of inert anode cells.For example, in inert anode cells, sulfur in ionized forms such assulfates, e.g., Na₂SO₄ and Na₂SO₃, may be present in various valencestates, e.g., S⁻², S⁰, S⁺², S⁺⁴ and S⁺⁶. The S⁺⁶ species is particularlydisadvantageous in inert anode cells because it can be easily reducedand subsequently reoxidized. The sulfur impurities form redox couplesbetween the anodes and cathodes of the cells which consume electricitywithout producing aluminum. Furthermore, sulfur impurities adverselyaffect the bath/aluminum interfacial energy such that uncoalescedaluminum is dispersed in the bath where it can be more easily oxidized.Current efficiency is significantly reduced as a result of sulfurimpurities. It is therefore desirable to eliminate some or all sulfurspecies from the bath. It is typically desirable to maintain sulfurimpurity levels below about 500 ppm in the bath, preferably below about250 ppm. In a particularly preferred embodiment, sulfur impurity levelsare maintained below about 100 ppm.

[0031] Iron impurities are disadvantageous because iron can also formredox couples which adversely affect current efficiency of the cell.Furthermore, it is desirable to minimize the amount of iron impuritiescontained in the aluminum produced by the cell. Iron impurity levels inthe produced aluminum are preferably maintained below about 0.5 weightpercent, typically below about 0.25 or 0.2 weight percent. In aparticularly preferred embodiment, the iron impurity level is belowabout 0.18 or 0.15 weight percent. Copper impurity levels in theproduced aluminum are preferably maintained below about 0.2 or 0.1weight percent, more preferably below about 0.04 or 0.03 weight percent.Nickel impurity levels in the produced aluminum are preferablymaintained below about 0.2 or 0.1 weight percent, more preferably belowabout 0.03 weight percent. The produced aluminum also preferably meetsthe following weight percentage standards for other types of impurities:0.2 maximum Si; 0.03 maximum Zn; and 0.03 maximum Co.

[0032] Individually, sulfur and iron impurities have been found tosignificantly reduce the current efficiency of inert anode aluminumproduction cells. For example, sulfur levels above about 500 ppm in someinert anode cells have been found to reduce the current efficiency ofthe cells below about 80 percent. The combination of sulfur and ironimpurities has been found to be particularly disadvantageous in inertanode cells. The build-up of combined sulfur and iron impurity levelscan actually cause aluminum produced during operation of the cell to beremoved.

[0033] It has been found that during the operation of inert anode cells,the amounts of sulfur and other impurities may initially be withinacceptable levels, but may increase to unacceptable levels duringcontinued operation of the cell. In comparison with consumable carbonanode cells which produce COS, inert anode cells have been found tobuild up sulfur impurities in the bath to levels above 500 ppm, oftenabove 1,000 ppm. FIG. 1 is a graph illustrating the build up of sulfurimpurity levels during operation of an aluminum production cell afterthe consumable carbon anodes of the cell have been replaced with inertanodes. After several days of operation with the inert anodes, thesulfur impurity level increases above 500 ppm.

[0034] In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention,impurity reduction zones are provided in aluminum production cells.FIGS. 2-5 illustrate embodiments in which reduction zones are createdthrough the use of at least one purifying electrode positioned in thebath.

[0035]FIG. 2 is a partially schematic side sectional view of an aluminumsmelting cell 10 in accordance with an embodiment of the presentinvention. The cell 10 includes a refractory wall 11 and a cathode 12.During operation, the cell 10 is partially filled with a moltenelectrolytic bath 13 which is contained by the refractory wall 11.During the aluminum production process, a molten pad of aluminum 14forms at the bottom of the cell 10. An anode assembly 15 includes anodes16 a and 16 b which are partially submerged in the bath 13. The anodes16 a and 16 b are positioned above the level of the cathode 12 in theembodiment shown in FIG. 2. However, other anode/cathode configurationsknown in the art may be used in accordance with the present invention inwhich at least a portion of the anode(s) are positioned at the samelevel as the cathode(s). With these configurations, sulfur impuritiestend to build up in the bath 13 without contacting the aluminum pad 14that is formed at the bottom of the cell 10. The anodes 16 a and 16 bpreferably comprise inert anodes, for example, as disclosed in U.S. Pat.Nos. 6,162,334, 6,217,739, 6,332,969, 6,372,119, 6,416,649, 6,423,195and 6,423,204. A purifying electrode 17 is partially submerged in thebath 13. The purifying electrode 17 may be made of any suitable materialsuch as carbon, graphite, TiB₂, W, Mo, carbon steel or stainless steel.

[0036] In the embodiment shown in FIG. 2, the purifying electrode 17 isconnected to the power supply of the cell 10. An oxygen barrier 18 isprovided in the bath 13 between the anode 16 b and the purifyingelectrode 17. The oxygen barrier 18 may be made of any suitable materialsuch as TiB₂, BN or ferrites. During anodic operation of the cell 10,current supplied to the purifying electrode 17 creates a positivepotential of sulfur, such that sulfur species are oxidized, e.g., togaseous phases such as COS and S0 ₂. The cell 10 is typically acommercial scale cell operated above 50,000 Amps for the commercialproduction of aluminum.

[0037]FIG. 3 is a partially schematic side sectional view of an aluminumsmelting cell 20 in accordance with another embodiment of the presentinvention. The cell 20 is similar to the cell 10 shown in FIG. 2, withthe exception that the purifying electrode 17 is connected to a separatepower supply 19.

[0038]FIG. 4 is a partially schematic side sectional view of an aluminumsmelting cell 30 in accordance with a further embodiment of the presentinvention. The cell 30 is similar to the cell 10 shown in FIG. 2, exceptthe cell 30 includes a purifying electrode 37 which operates in acathodic mode through its contact with the molten aluminum pad 14 which,in turn, is electrically connected to the cathode 12. The purifyingelectrode 37 operates at a negative potential of sulfur, such thatsulfur species are reduced, e.g., to elemental S or gaseous S₂.

[0039]FIG. 5 is a partially schematic side sectional view of an aluminumsmelting cell 40 in accordance with another embodiment of the presentinvention. The cell 40 is similar to the cell 30 shown in FIG. 4, exceptit includes a purifying electrode 47 that is externally connected to thecathode 12.

[0040]FIG. 6 is a partially schematic side sectional view of an aluminumsmelting cell 50 in accordance with a further embodiment of the presentinvention. The cell 50 is similar to the cell 10 shown in FIG. 2, exceptthe cell 50 does not include a purifying electrode and is provided withan oxygen barrier tube 52 partially submerged in the bath 13. The oxygenbarrier tube 52 may be made of any suitable material such as alumina,TiB₂, BN or ferrites. The interior 53 of the oxygen barrier tube 52contains a portion of the bath 13 which is isolated from gaseous speciesgenerated at the interface between the anodes 16 a and 16 b and the bath13. For example, when the anodes 16 a and 16 b comprise inert anodes,oxygen generated at the anode/bath interface is prevented from enteringthe interior 53 of the barrier tube 52. This substantially oxygen-freezone allows sulfur-containing species such as SO₂ to vent from the bath13 through the barrier tube 52 rather than creating unwantedoxygen-containing reaction products in the bath 13.

[0041]FIG. 7 is a graph of sulfur concentration versus operation time ofbench scale aluminum production cells operated with a single inertanode. In FIG. 7, the dashed lines represent tests performed with nopurifying electrodes, while the solid lines represent tests performedwith TiB₂ purifying electrodes. The dashed lines in FIG. 7 show sulfurlevels in the test cell operated without a purifying electrode, afterdoping with 200 ppm sulfur (lower dashed line) then doping with 300 ppmsulfur (upper dashed line). Doping was done using Na₂SO₃. The sameresults were achieved using Na₂SO as the dopant. The sulfurconcentration remained substantially constant or slightly increased inthese cells operated without a purifying electrode The round points inFIG. 7 are from a test cell similar to those illustrated in FIGS. 2 and3 incororating a TiB₂ purifying electrode which was maintained at anelectrode potential of E=0 V relative to the aluminum potential. In thiscell, the sulfur concentration decreased from an initial level of about560 ppm to about 110 ppm within 2 hours. The square points in FIG. 7 arefrom a test cell similar to that shown in FIG. 4 with a TiB₂ purifyingelectrode immersed into the metal pad. In this cell, the sulfurconcentration decreased from about 250 ppm to about 110 ppm within 2hours. The triangular points in FIG. 7 are from a test cell similar tothat shown in FIG. 5 in which a TiB₂ purifying electrode was externallyconnected to the cathode. In this cell, the sulfur impurity leveldecreased from about 160 ppm to about 120 ppm in 2 hours.

[0042] An electrochemical test was conducted to determine the affect ofsulfur impurity concentrations on the current efficiency of a test cellcomprising an inert anode. The test was conducted by setting up anelectrolytic cell using commercial Hall-bath and a cermet inert anode,adding different concentrations of S as sulfide/sulfate into the bath,and using standard cyclic voltammetry and chronopotentiometry methods todetermine the effect of S concentration in the bath on currentefficiency. FIG. 8 is a graph of current efficiency versus sulfurconcentration in the bath, demonstrating significant decreases incurrent efficiencies as the sulfur impurity levels increase. At sulfurconcentrations above 500 ppm, the current efficiency of the celldecreases below 70 percent.

[0043]FIG. 9 is a graph showing current efficiency versus sulfurimpurity levels in a bath and total impurity levels in the producedaluminum. A test was performed to determine the influence of sulfur oncurrent efficiency at a relatively large scale. An electrochemical cellincluding one inert anode and was operated at 950 Amperes. Initially theelectrolyte was low in sulfur and the contaminates in the aluminumproduced by the cell were at low levels. Since the alumina is decomposedto oxygen and aluminum, oxygen evolution from the cell was used todetermine the current efficiency of the cell. Aluminum contaminants suchas iron, nickel and copper were added to the cell to determine theireffect on current efficiency. FIG. 9 is a summary of the results of thistest. At low sulfur levels in the electrolytic bath and low aluminumimpurities, the current efficiency was above 90 percent. As sulfur andcontaminants were added the current efficient initially fell below 80percent, then 70 percent, and eventually dropped to less than 50percent. As shown in FIG. 9, current efficiency is substantiallydecreased by sulfur impurities in the bath and impurities contained inthe aluminum produced by the cell.

[0044] After running a test in an inert anode cell at 4 amp/cm² for 30mins, 500 ppm of S as Na₂SO₃ was added to the bath. The metal at the endof the test was not coalesced. Several aluminum spheres were present inthe solidified bath, and a few aluminum spheres were seen in thesolidified bath. Photographs of uncoalesced aluminum spheres areprovided in FIGS. 10b-10 d. For comparison purposes, a photograph ofsolidified bath having a coalesced aluminum pad from a cell having aminimal sulfur impurity level is shown in FIG. 10a.

[0045] In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention,the impurity reduction zone is created through all or a portion of thebath by adding or controlling the distribution of reductants such as Al,Na₂CO₃, CaCO₃, Li₂CO₃, MgCO₃, CO and CO₂. When Al is used to reduceimpurities, it may be added in the form of recirculated aluminumproduced by the cell, or the aluminum may be added as pellets, rods orslabs. The aluminum reductant may be continuously or intermittentlyadded to the bath. Gaseous reductants such as CO and CO₂ may be added tothe bath by means such as standard sparging techniques.

[0046] In accordance with a further embodiment of the present invention,electric current flow may be interrupted through some or all of theelectrodes of a cell in order to allow impurities to escape from thecell in gaseous forms. For example, electrode current may be interruptedto some or all of the inert anodes of a cell in order to allowsulfur-containing gas such as sulfur dioxide to escape from the bath.Alternatively, selected regions of the cell may not include anodes inorder to provide a region or regions within the cell where oxygengeneration is reduced or eliminated.

[0047] The various embodiments for producing impurity reduction zones asdescribed herein may be combined. For example, when an oxygen barriertube as show in FIG. 6 is used, a purifying electrode such as shown inFIGS. 2-5 may be positioned within the tube. Alternatively, purifyingreductants such as aluminum may be introduced into the bath through suchan oxygen barrier tube, with or without the additional use of apurifying electrode.

[0048] In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention,sulfur contained in gaseous emissions from inert anode cells is removedby scrubbing techniques. During inert anode cell operations, the hotgases emitted from the cell may be recovered and used to heat theincoming alumina feed by passing the hot gases over the alumina. Whensulfur and other impurities contained in the gaseous emissions contactthe alumina, they are absorbed and carried back to the cell by theincoming alumina. Scrubbing removes sulfur in the off-gas flow, e.g., byelectrostatic or chemical (wet or dry scrubbing) means. Electrostatictechniques use electrically charged plates or electrostaticprecipitators, which attract the charged sulfur species. The surface isperiodically cleaned to remove deposited sulfur species. Wet scrubbingmeans injecting water or a chemical solution into the exhaust gases. Dryscrubbing uses materials having high surface areas, such as activecarbon or lime, which react with the gases.

[0049] Sulfur removal may be achieved by passing the gaseous emissionsthrough a bed of reactive material such as activated carbon or the like.Adsorption of SO₂ onto activated carbon occurs in two steps. In thefirst step SO₂ is catalytically oxidized on the carbon to SO₃. Then theSO₃ hydrolyzes in the presence of water vapor to form sulfuric acid,which condenses in the pores of the carbon:

[0050]FIG. 11 is a schematic diagram of a sulfur scrubbing system 60including a cell 62 equipped with a hood 64. Pot gases 66 comprisingoxygen, sulfur-containing species such as SO₂ and fluorides flow fromthe cell 62 to an activated carbon bed 68 where the SO₂ and othersulfur-containing species are removed. Carbon and sulfuric acid 70 fromthe activated carbon bed 68 are treated in a regeneration chamber 72,and regenerated carbon 74 is reintroduced into the activated carbon bed68. The activated carbon can be regenerated by treatment with water inthe regeneration chamber 72 to form an effluent 73 such as dilute acidor chemicals such as gypsum. Oxygen and fluoride gases 76 exit theactivated carbon bed 68 and pass through a dry alumina scrubber 78 toremove fluoride values so they can be returned to the cell 62, therebyrecycling the fluoride values and minimizing fluoride emissions to theatmosphere. Gases from the scrubber 78 are vented 80 to atmosphere.Alumina 82 is fed to the dry scrubber 78. As described in more detailbelow, the alumina 82 may comprise various sulfur impurity contents.After the alumina 82 is contacted with the oxygen and fluoride gases 76in the dry scrubber 78, the alumina and absorbed fluorides 84 arerecycled 86 to the cell 62. It is important that the SO₂ scrubbing inthe activated carbon bed 68 does not remove a significant amount of thefluoride from the pot gases 66 so the maximum amount of fluorides can berecycled to the cell 62 via contact with the alumina 82 in the dryscrubber 78.

[0051] In addition ot the system 60 shown in FIG. 11, alternativescrubbing or stripping systems that may be used in accordance with thepresent invention include other types of reactive beds such as limebeds, aqueous leaching systems, electrostatic precipitators, and thelike.

[0052] In accordance with a further embodiment of the present invention,the sulfur content of various materials introduced into the bath iscontrolled. FIGS. 12-17 illustrate, through mass balance calculations,the influence on the steady state concentration of sulfur in the cell ofthe following parameters: the use of cleaner raw materials; scrubbingSO₂ from the pot gas to reduce recycle back to the cell; and providingan impurity reduction zone in the cell. FIG. 12 shows that with a sulfurcontent in the alumina fed to the cell of 60 ppm, and considering 40percent efficient dry scrubbing, the steady state sulfur in the bathwould be under 100 ppm. As shown in FIG. 13, with 110 ppm sulfur in thealumina, the use of an activate carbon bed also can achieve 102 ppmsulfur in the bath. As shown in FIG. 14, with 110 ppm sulfur in thealumina and without the activated carbon bed, the sulfur increases to170 ppm. Increasing the sulfur in the alumina to 250 increases thesulfur in the bath to 374 ppm, as shown in FIG. 15. The use of animpurity reducing zone in the cell would increase the SO₂ removalfour-fold, allowing the use of 250 ppm sulfur alumina while achieving asulfur level in the bath of less than 100 ppm, as shown in FIG. 16. Thecombination of an impurity reducing zone in the cell with activatedcarbon scrubbing can permit the use of alumina containing as much as 450ppm while still achieving a sulfur level in the bath of 100 ppm, asshown in FIG. 17.

[0053] In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, thesulfur content of alumina may be selected within various ranges whilemaintaining acceptable sulfur impurity levels in the bath. For example,low-sulfur alumina having a sulfur content within a range of from about40 to about 100 ppm may be used with no additional sulfur-reducingsteps, or with minimal additional sulfur-reducing techniques.Medium-sulfur alumina having a sulfur content within a range of fromabout 100 to about 250 ppm may be used with selected sulfur-reducingtechniques of the present invention necessary to achieve the desiredsulfur concentration in the bath. High-sulfur alumina having a sulfurcontent of from about 250 to about 600 ppm or higher may be used incombination with the present sulfur-reducing techniques in order tomaintain the desired sulfur concentration in the bath.

[0054] Having described the presently preferred embodiments, it is to beunderstood that the invention may be otherwise embodied within the scopeof the appended claims.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method of operating an inert anode electrolyticaluminum production cell, the method comprising: providing a cellcomprising an electrolytic bath, a cathode and at least one inert anodelocated at or above a level of the cathode; passing current between theat least one inert anode and the cathode through the electrolytic bath;and maintaining a sulfur impurity concentration in the electrolytic bathof less than about 500 ppm.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the sulfurimpurity concentration is maintained below about 250 ppm.
 3. The methodof claim 2, wherein the cell operates at a current efficiency of atleast about 80 percent.
 4. The method of claim 2, wherein the celloperates at a current efficiency of at least about 90 percent.
 5. Themethod of claim 1, wherein the sulfur impurity concentration ismaintained below about 100 ppm.
 6. The method of claim 5, wherein thecell operates at a current efficiency of at least about 80 percent. 7.The method of claim 5, wherein the cell operates at a current efficiencyof at least about 90 percent.
 8. The method of claim 1, wherein thesulfur impurity concentration is maintained during a cell operationperiod of at least 1 day.
 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the sulfurimpurity concentration is maintained during a cell operation period ofat least 10 days.
 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the sulfur impurityconcentration is maintained by providing an impurity reduction zone inthe electrolytic bath.
 11. The method of claim 10, wherein the impurityreduction zone is provided by a purifying electrode at least partiallysubmerged in the electrolytic bath.
 12. The method of claim 10, whereinthe impurity reduction zone is provided by an oxygen barrier member atleast partially submerged in the electrolytic bath.
 13. The method ofclaim 10, wherein the impurity reduction zone is provided by adding apurifying reductant to the electrolytic bath.
 14. The method of claim10, wherein the impurity reduction zone is provided by removing at leastone inert anode from a region of the cell.
 15. The method of claim 10,wherein the impurity reduction zone is provided by interruptingelectrical current through at least one electrode of the cell.
 16. Themethod of claim 1, wherein the sulfur impurity concentration ismaintained by controlling sulfur impurities absorbed on alumina added tothe electrolytic bath.
 17. The method of claim 16, wherein the absorbedsulfur impurities are controlled by scrubbing sulfur impurities fromgaseous emissions generated from the electrolytic bath prior tocontacting the gaseous emissions with the alumina that is added to theelectrolytic bath.
 18. The method of claim 17, wherein the sulfurimpurities are scrubbed by passing the emissions through a bed ofreactive material.
 19. The method of claim 18, wherein the bed ofreactive material comprises activated carbon.
 20. The method of claim 1,wherein the sulfur impurity concentration is maintained by controllingsulfur impurities added to the bath.
 21. The method of claim 20, whereinthe step of controlling sulfur impurities added to the bath includescontrolling sulfur content of alumina and/or fluorides added to thebath.
 22. The method of claim 1, wherein the sulfur impurityconcentration is maintained by controlling sulfur content of aluminaadded to the bath.
 23. The method of claim 22, wherein the sulfurcontent of the alumina is less than about 100 ppm.
 24. The method ofclaim 22, wherein the sulfur content of the alumina is less than about250 ppm.
 25. The method of claim 24, wherein the sulfur impurityconcentration in the bath is maintained below about 100 ppm.
 26. Themethod of claim 22, wherein the sulfur content of the alumina is greaterthan about 250 ppm.
 27. The method of claim 26, wherein the sulfurimpurity concentration in the bath is maintained below about 250 ppm.28. The method of claim 26, wherein the sulfur impurity concentration inthe bath is maintained below about 100 ppm.
 29. The method of claim 1,wherein aluminum produced by the cell has an iron impurity level of lessthan about 0.5 weight percent.
 30. The method of claim 1, whereinaluminum produced by the cell has maximum impurity levels of about 0.5weight percent iron, about 0.2 weight percent copper and about 0.2weight percent nickel.
 31. The method of claim 1, wherein aluminumproduced by the cell has maximum impurity levels of about 0.25 weightpercent iron, about 0.1 weight percent copper, and about 0.1 weightpercent nickel.
 32. The method of claim 1, wherein the cell operates ata current efficiency of at least about 80 percent.
 33. The method ofclaim 1, wherein the cell operates at a current efficiency of at leastabout 90 percent.
 34. A method of reducing sulfur impurities in an inertanode electrolytic aluminum production cell, the method comprisingproviding an impurity reduction zone within an electrolytic bath of thecell.
 35. The method of claim 34, wherein the impurity reduction zone isprovided by a purifying electrode at least partially submerged in theelectrolytic bath.
 36. The method of claim 35, wherein the purifyingelectrode is anodic.
 37. The method of claim 35, wherein the purifyingelectrode is cathodic.
 38. The method of claim 35, wherein the purifyingelectrode comprises carbon, graphite, TiB₂, W, Mo, carbon steel orstainless steel.
 39. The method of claim 34, wherein the impurityreduction zone is provided by an oxygen barrier member at leastpartially submerged in the electrolytic bath.
 40. The method of claim39, wherein the oxygen barrier member comprises a tube partiallysubmerged in the electrolytic bath and extending above a surface of theelectrolytic bath.
 41. The method of claim 34, wherein the impurityreduction zone is provided by adding a purifying reductant to theelectrolytic bath.
 42. The method of claim 41, wherein the purifyingreductant comprises Al.
 43. The method of claim 41, wherein thepurifying reductant comprises CO and/or CO₂.
 44. The method of claim 41,wherein the purifying reductant is introduced into the electrolytic bathcontinuously during operation of the cell.
 45. The method of claim 34,wherein the impurity reduction zone is provided by removing at least oneinert anode from a region of the cell.
 46. The method of claim 34,wherein the impurity reduction zone is provided by interruptingelectrical current through at least one electrode of the cell in orderto allow gaseous impurities to escape from the cell.
 47. The method ofclaim 34, wherein the sulfur impurity is present in the electrolyticbath in the form of sulfur ions.
 48. The method of claim 34, wherein thesulfur impurity level in the electrolytic bath is maintained below about500 ppm.
 49. The method of claim 34, wherein the sulfur impurity levelin the electrolytic bath is maintained below about 250 ppm.
 50. Themethod of claim 34, wherein the sulfur impurity level in theelectrolytic bath is maintained below about 100 ppm.
 51. The method ofclaim 50, wherein alumina added to the bath has a sulfur content of lessthan 100 ppm.
 52. The method of claim 50, wherein alumina added to thebath has a sulfur content of from about 100 to about 250 ppm.
 53. Themethod of claim 50, wherein alumina added to the bath has a sulfurcontent of greater than about 250 ppm.
 54. The method of claim 34,wherein aluminum produced by the cell has an iron impurity level of lessthan about 0.5 weight percent.
 55. The method of claim 34, whereinaluminum produced by the cell has maximum impurity levels of about 0.5weight percent iron, about 0.2 weight percent copper and about 0.2weight percent nickel.
 56. The method of claim 34, wherein aluminumproduced by the cell has maximum impurity levels of about 0.25 weightpercent iron, about 0.1 weight percent copper and about 0.1 weightpercent nickel.
 57. The method of claim 34, wherein the cell operates ata current efficiency of at least about 80 percent.
 58. The method ofclaim 34, wherein the cell operates at a current efficiency of at leastabout 90 percent.
 59. The method of claim 34, wherein the inert anodescomprise a cermet composite material.
 60. The method of claim 34,wherein the cell comprises a cathode and at least one inert anodelocated at or above a level of the cathode.
 61. A method of producingaluminum, the method comprising: providing a cell comprising anelectrolytic bath, a cathode and at least one inert anode located at orabove a level of the cathode; passing current between the at least oneinert anode and the cathode through the electrolytic bath; maintaining asulfur impurity concentration in the electrolytic bath of less thanabout 500 ppm; and recovering aluminum from the cell.
 62. An inert anodeelectrolytic aluminum production cell comprising means for reducing asulfur impurity concentration in an electrolytic bath of the cell belowabout 500 ppm during operation of the cell.
 63. An inert anodeelectrolytic aluminum production cell comprising: a cathode; at leastone inert anode located at or above a level of the cathode; anelectrolytic bath communicating with the cathode and the at least oneanode; and a sulfur impurity reduction zone within the electrolyticbath.
 64. An inert anode electrolytic aluminum production cellcomprising: a cathode; at least one inert anode; an electrolytic bathcommunicating with the cathode and the at least one anode; and apurifying electrode at least partially submerged in the electrolyticbath for providing a sulfur impurity reduction zone within theelectrolytic bath.
 65. A method of reducing sulfur impurities in aconsumable carbon anode electrolytic aluminum production cell, themethod comprising providing a sulfur impurity reduction zone within anelectrolytic bath of the cell.
 66. The method of claim 65, wherein thesulfur impurity reduction zone is provided by a purifying electrode atleast partially submerged in the electrolytic bath.